|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Marilyn Monroe, Joe DiMaggio and Who?!
Without a doubt the most scandalous hoax since the Hitler diaries and Milli Vanilli! By Mark Bellinghaus Did you see that psychic guy on Entertainment Tonight, that James Van Praagh? He had one of Marilyn Monroe’s hair curlers, it even had a Marilyn hair on it—and this guy was acting like Marilyn was talking to him! Spooky! (He’s also the inspiration behind CBS’s Ghost Whisperer.) (It figures!) (Photo: "Psychic" James van Praagh, at the ET show, on December 2nd,2005, holding up a "hair of Marilyn Monroe"that is what he said!) Those curlers are a highlight of Marilyn Monroe: the Exhibit, a display now (the exhibit started on November 11th 2005), on the Queen Mary ocean liner in Long Beach, California, advertised as the largest private collection of Marilyn memorabilia ever assembled, worth $10 million dollars. But I have a problem with those hair curlers: it took only the briefest Internet research, and a call to Clairol, to establish that they were first manufactured in 1974 (but Marilyn passed away in 1962. . .and that $10 million exhibit can’t be worth more than $25 to $30 thousand at most.
(Photo: Highlight of the Marilyn Monroe exhibit: a Clairol 20 Instant hairsetter from 1974! MM died 12 years earlier.) So, the hair curlers are not authentic. The exhibit is not authentic. The people behind the exhibit are not telling the truth, or are not who they say they are. There is documentation, and a Marilyn authority, to back up these statements.
ROBERT W. OTTO, 56, President of Marilyn Monroe Exhibits
(Photo: The recent cover of Marilyn Monroe, this time on the December 2005 issue, with three different articles (by Lisa DePaulo) and the worst photo, ever published, of Marilyn Monroe! Bravo, Mr. Heffner you should be really proud of yourself!) Let’s begin with the most outrageous character – June DiMaggio. Who is she? The last name itself creates interest and memories of the sweet past, the Yankee Clipper, Simon & Garfunkel's "Mrs. Robinson," and even Madonna includes the name in her “Vogue” ode to fame. But now I want to change that famous lyric to "Where have you come from, June DiMaggio?"
I watched her last November during the press opening for Marilyn Monroe: the Exhibit at the Queen Mary, and it was a weird, unreal experience—like a theatre performance gone bad. When talking about Marilyn, she shouted and stuttered, then regained her pace and followed (it seemed to me) her rehearsed lines. Let’s begin with her one excusable untruth, her age. She claims to be 77, but for any former actress and dancer, knocking five years off is forgivable. But not so when it comes to twisting facts and fabricating fictions about the biggest and best-loved movie star of the 20th century. June says she was best of friends with Marilyn Monroe, and that her mother, Lee, wife of Tom DiMaggio (one of Joe's eight siblings), was Marilyn’s closest friend, and even knew who murdered her — Lee was chatting with her on the phone when the killer walked into Marilyn’s bedroom. Lee never told, because “she wanted her children to live.”
(Photo: Mary Jane Popp, June DiMaggio, Robert W. Otto, Hugh Heffner, left to right) During June DiMaggio’s interviews, her co-writer Mary Jane Popp, actress, infomercial and radio host (www.PoppOff.com), always stood close by her side and sometimes gave the answers for her, because she sounded very coached and prepared. June repeated herself with what seemed like anger in her voice, camouflaged as a "sweet old lady with the trademark bangs". In some ways she reminded me of a marionette being dragged from one stage to the next, with her explosive news on Marilyn Monroe. She gave interviews even in the hallways, always making sure that the viewers would believe (and buy her book), her statements still sounding in my ear: "THAT IS THE TRUTH!” and “YOU CAN READ ABOUT ALL THIS IN MY BOOK!" But you can feel when someone is hiding something, and now I can prove it.
(Photo: Two of Monroe's personal address books, which sold at Christie's on September 20th, 2001 for $ 18,213,- and went to a collector in Spain. These are two of four, which I had checked for June or Lee DiMaggio. Their names are not present!) In my research, I find no evidence at all that Monroe was even friendly with Lee or June DiMaggio. The San Francisco newspaper story on Marilyn and Joe’s wedding has Lee and Tom on the guest list, but June is not mentioned. The names of Lee and June do not appear in four of Monroe's personal address and phone books -- these items sold at auctions in recent years for astronomical amounts. Because of my friendship with most of the known Monroe collectors, I could ask the new owners to look into those personal and intimate Monroe artifacts; it was not surprising to find that June DiMaggio and her mother Lee are not listed in any of them . . . while Joe DiMaggio and his son Joe Jr. are present in all of them. In the infamous December Playboy interview, June DiMaggio claims to have attended the funeral of Marilyn Monroe ("as I was riding along with my uncle Joe in a limousine..."). There are numerous photos disproving this statement.
(The inside of the limousine, Joe DiMaggio, his son, JoeJr, unidentified driver and passenger, but where is June DiMaggio? She claims to have been with her famous uncle that day) We also have a witness who can testify to June’s absence. Funeral director Allan Abbott, 68, was a pallbearer for Marilyn’s funeral. At Joe DiMaggio’s request, he also stood at the door checking off the names on the brief guest list, handing programs to each person on the list. He told me he’d never heard the name June DiMaggio in his life. Ernest Cunningham’s book The Ultimate Marilyn identifies the small group of invited guests but June is still missing.
(Photo by Leigh Wiener: as Marilyn Monroe’s casket is being introduced to her final resting place, Allan Abbot on the corner to the coffin, Joe DiMaggio and his son are sitting in the second row, and again: where is June DiMaggio?) Allan Abbott was 24 at the time Monroe was buried, but his memory is still fresh. This man’s statement was the true reason I continued in my investigations. My deepest appreciation goes out to him, a great man who had the honor of carrying Marilyn Monroe’s casket to her crypt, where we can visit her now, pay tribute, and weep.
(Photo:The lipstick and flower covered crypt of the Hollywood legend) June is the latest in a long line of Marilyn frauds, men and women coming out of nowhere, claiming to be Marilyn Monroe's son or daughter (or husband or lover, whatever). There’s a man claiming to be the illegitimate son of Marilyn and JFK, insisting that the three of them had lived openly in Marilyn’s Brentwood home. There was Robert Slatzer, who passed away last year, who claimed (with nothing to document it) that he had been married to Marilyn.
Publicity for the Queen Many exhibit states that 90% of the Monroe memorabilia was bought from June DiMaggio and Joe Franklin. June says she got her items directly from Marilyn. The problem is that there’s nothing to prove that any of the June junk is authentic—no photos, no documentation. (Unless you’re willing to accept the word of that E.T. psychic.) The other items are from eBay and from questionable sellers, some of whom are being investigated by the FBI. How do you authenticate an item? Keep reading, I’ll explain it to you.
(Photo: Robert W.Otto, CEO of the Marilyn Monroe exhibit, and famous psychic James van Praagh, during a sequence for CBS's ET, aired on 12/02/2005) The next player in this trashy affair is Robert W. Otto who came to collector’s fame overnight, like a one-hit wonder. In an interview with the Los Angeles Times writer Robert W. Welkos, on November 11, 2005, Otto explained that no other Marilyn collectors had ever heard of him, “Because I kept a low profile and courted those people who actually knew Marilyn and acquired items from them." Otto also mentioned NYC radio host Joe Franklin, who has sold many items from the famous guests who had appeared on his show. But here again, not ONE item came with a picture of Marilyn wearing it. Not one! Otto also says, "I also chose not to collect the bigger show pieces." Okay, so what about the strapless pink gown that Marilyn famously wore while singing “Diamonds Are A Girl’s Best Friend”? A press release says that it’s on display at the entrance to the exhibit
(Photo: Welcoming the visitor: a copy of a famous Marilyn Monroe costume (NOT THE ORIGINAL!), displayed in an almost frightening way!)
He has also bought on eBay or at live auctions which originated from the huge Monroe estate sale at Christie’s—Otto visited but didn’t participate. In other words, anybody who bought in that sale and won more than ten original pieces would then be able to claim to have a Marilyn collection of Otto’s extent—and that could be hundreds of collectors, as there were so many items sold! To mix in a few authentic items – and have the rest of it as wannabe Marilyn Monroe items - is fraud.
(Photo:FAKE & REAL! In December of 2004, Otto and Roessler held their first exhibit in their Indianapolis Legends Museum, note that the pink dress, which is I have signed witness statements from several Marilyn collectors who can identify items in the Queen Mary exhibit as being bought through eBay. Robert Otto contacted me as well, in July of 2004, under his eBay screen name "PinkDoodleDandy1" (nomen est omen?), seeking to buy Marilyn memorabilia. I first thought he was kidding when he offered me a jokingly low amount for a Marilyn belt. She was wearing this item when she walked out of her 508 N. Palm Drive, Beverly Hills home, tearfully announcing to the press that she was getting a divorce from Joe DiMaggio. She wore the same belt when she revealed that she was going to marry Arthur Miller. I have photos of her wearing the belt, which was made by JAX. This is another example that really proves how simple Marilyn’s life was.
(Photo's: Two important announcements in the life of Marilyn Monroe, one belt!) In the L.A. Times interview, Otto was also asked why there were no photos of Marilyn wearing the clothing on display. His answer was that, as with anyone else, the clothing Marilyn wore in private didn’t appear in photos. Is that so? Look at the photo here: it shows Marilyn in nothing but private clothing! She hung on to these checkered pants she had worn as Norma Jeane, posing on the beach for numerous private shoots. Later, she wore them for top photographers like the legendary Alfred Eisenstaedt. Those same pants are visible in numerous photo sessions throughout her career—proving that she was a very simple person, and that she held on to the items she’d had before she became a mega-star, sex symbol, and the most photographed woman in the world. I went into detail here because this is what you want to display in an exhibit, and this is really how you want to display them. But Otto’s exhibit has no such items at all, no such showmanship. I was also very lucky to have purchased that familiar black turtleneck sweater for my own collection I paid a fortune for both pieces (from the Estate sale).
(Photos: Marilyn Monroe, outside her 882 N.Doheny Dr. home, the black turtleneck sweater she also wore in Korea, my latest purchase at auction, originating from the estate of Marilyn Monroe, photo taken by Alfred Eisenstaedt; and having a "private moment" with then husband Joe DiMaggio and wearing her most favorite black and white checkered pants, made by JAX)
On her last day, August 4th, Marilyn supposedly asked June to make her an anchovy pizza, and June says she did. But then Junie goes way too far—she claims she went to Monroe’s home, after her body was removed, to retrieve her pizza pan. But it was a crime scene, all doors had been sealed by the LAPD. (There are photos of the sealed doors!) But June apparently walked into the house unnoticed, retrieved her precious pizza pan—plus a teddy bear and one of Marilyn’s nightgowns—all of them now prominently on display in Otto’s exhibition on the Queen Mary. There is no way any of this could have happened. Also: if Monroe really ate that anchovy pizza, or anything else for that matter, why did the autopsy find no food in her stomach?
(Photo by Leigh Wiener: ALL doors were sealed by the LAPD, not only the front door! Note that the Spanish Hacienda has no attics!) June DiMaggio’s book was announced for December ’05. Did the publisher get cold feet? maybe he was nervous after the Oprah Winfrey/James Frey scare? When pitching her book, June promised "Any female buyer who buys my book will receive a copy of the pre-engagement ring my uncle gave to Marilyn!" This is just another tale without any proof. And PROOF is what I was looking for all through my investigation. My colleague Sherry Dodd actually interviewed June DiMaggio and asked if she owned any pictures of herself with either her famous uncle, baseball legend Joe DiMaggio, or her famous friend of eleven years, Marilyn Monroe. But her answer was simply, "No, I do not, I am sorry!" That answer alone added to suspicions I had from the very first. How can someone NOT have any sort of documentation for the serious and spectacular claims she makes? "But it happened!" she says.
If you’ve seen the advertising for the exhibit—billboards, newspaper ads, banners—you will have noticed Marilyn’s trademarked signature, which indicates that the Estate of Marilyn Monroe approves. The estate of Marilyn Monroe is standing behind the exhibit (also as a sponsor), scheduled to tour the world asking unsuspecting people to pay an outrageous $22.95 per person to see the most absurd and tackiest presentation of Marilyn Monroe ever. That’s a scandal!
(Photo: The General Admission ticket, which shows a wrong, mirror image of Marilyn Monroe and states: "....This exhibit is the world's largest private collection of Marilyn artifacts ever assembled. The exhibit on display at the Queen Mary features intimate pieces of personal property owned by the most famous glamorous icon of the 20th century.)
On his weekly live webcast, Roesler twice invited Otto into his CMG office, and together they went through the would-be Marilyn items with Otto weaving stories about them out of thin air. For example: Otto showed an engraved bracelet and created a whole absurd story—as if he had been there in person, knowing exactly when, where and why Marilyn owned that particular item. You are almost tempted to believe him . . . but I have witnesses that the man is everything but an "historian of Marilyn Monroe," as Roesler introduced him. Roesler had two different Otto interviews on his web site, which have been pulled. In one interview with Roesler, Otto mentions how they were together at the 1999 Christie's auction, and indicates how much money a pair of Monroe’s Ferragamo stilettos had sold for. Then Otto holds up the Clairol hair rollers which I described earlier. I was dumbfounded to see all these items, because I recognized many of them from earlier eBay auctions. I’ll say it again: none of the items originated from the estate of Marilyn Monroe, owned by Anna Strasberg, client of Mark Roesler.
(Photo: Robert W. Otto, Hugh Heffner, Mark Roesler, left to right) If "Marilyn Monroe: the Exhibit" were authentic, it would truly be an experience to walk through and to feel the essence, the private and personal taste of a rare and unique legend!
(Photo: The cover of the Christie's auction catalog. On 415 pages, and 576 Lots, were belongings listed, entirely from the estate of Marilyn Monroe. The biggest and most publicized live auction, ever!)
(Photo: Lot # 55, the most expensive gown, ever sold at auction: The "Happy Birthday Mr. President dress" which sold at Christie's in 1999 for $1,267,500,-!) The Otto exhibit is obviously trying to copy that experience. Which is just impossible. You will agree if you compare the blonde wig that he claims is from the movie Some Like it Hot, and which is displayed front to back (why, if not for people to see how new it is?) but which could have been bought on Hollywood Blvd. (or Times Square)! To my knowledge—and I was present when he won his bid—the only item that Mark Roessler purchased was the wig Monroe wore in the movie The Misfits,which sold as Lot #350 for a whopping $29,900!
(Photo: The Misfits wig )
But you don’t need to be an expert to tell the difference between the wig that Roesler won, and the brand new wig in the Otto collection. If they were displayed together, anyone could tell the difference: the real one was stored for 37 years and the natural deterioration is visible. Such deterioration is missing from the wig on display. Also, most of the dresses look to be in excellent condition, as if they had just been picked up from the dry cleaner.
(Photo: People weekly magazine, August 16, 1999 the Originals!)
(Photo: Almost! The red dress looks almost like the ORIGINAL, except that it is way too shiny, (button) new ( the most 10 years old) and sold on eBay for nothing! The security guard(background) makes it look really expensive!)
There’s another story from June that I’d never heard. She says she gave Marilyn a painted mirror, which the star always carried. The mirror is displayed next to a pair of deteriorating shoes—and these got my interest, because of the state they were in. Finally, an authentic piece? No such luck! The shoes have red and green rhinestones attached and are simply too much for Marilyn: we know that she dressed very simply in private. And I can assure you that if we made DNA tests of the real hair of Marilyn that I own (included in Anna Strasberg's treasures from storage), then we could also prove these are most likely thrift-store finds or even June DiMaggio's relics—but definitely not shoes that Marilyn wore!
(Photo: the mirrors and the unimaginable shoes on a Marilyn Monroe for private use) There’s no Marilyn story sadder, more shocking, than that of Bebe Goddard, Marilyn’s foster sister, with whom Marilyn spent part of her teenage years. Bebe sold fraudulent Marilyn items at auctions and over the Internet, and items are still being sold in her name. Letters which prove this charge were found in her belongings after her death and are the sad witness to a shocking sellout of a legend. Bebe Goddard's items are restricted from the traditional auction houses like Christie's or Sotheby's, but you’ll find them all over eBay. Also restricted forever are items from another well known fraud: Elaine Barrymore, the last wife of the great John Barrymore. Elaine passed away several years ago, but criminal (eBay) sellers are making a fortune in copying her signed letter and selling rubbish as the belongings of Marilyn Monroe. Mr. Otto has quite a collection of Barrymore items.
(Photo: a real Elaine Barrymore necklace, worn and owned by anybody BUT Marilyn Monroe!)
(Photo: the brand new and over the top looking Marilyn Monroe sun glasses)
Then there’s the engraving myth! Almost 50% of the jewelry in Otto's collection has "MM" engravings, and even the travel bags and suitcase (in uncommon red) are carrying MM engravings. That is absolutely wrong: in the bona fide Christie’s estate sale there was only one item (aside from the trophies and awards that she had won) that was engraved, and that was not by Monroe, but for her! Otto and Co. tried to create a Monroe the way they want to see her: in the way they saw her, for example, in the August 16, 1999, People magazine feature on the big Christie’s auction. The Queen Mary exhibit has items very similar in style to those from Christie’s —but which an expert could certainly identify as phony. Otto is displaying just too many items with rhinestones attached! -- which shows no knowledge of Marilyn’s personal likes and dislikes.
(Photo: MM posed with a tennis racket, but never played that sport, note the shoes, it would have been fatal!) There’s a powder compact with a watch attached, a gift from Joe, with an engraving to remind Marilyn to be on time. There’s Marilyn’s tennis racket . . . but we know she hated all sports and was only posing with a racket for photos. Also note that she’s wearing high heels! June says she taught Monroe how to type and, by sheer coincidence, there’s the typewriter in Otto's exhibit. And so on. But does she or Otto have any sort of photographic proof? Since Monroe was the most photographed woman in the world, surely it would have been a simple matter to have a snapshot of Marilyn and June happily sitting at the piano . . . the very piano which June DiMaggio says Marilyn used to rehearse her "Happy Birthday, Mr. President” song. We can imagine that this piece will be either in the exhibit or on sale for big bucks. The storytelling goes on and on and people seriously seem to believe her: that’s the irony on all this. But June goes too far, goes overboard with her accusations. As when she claims in these excerpts from her overdue book: "Since Marilyn was always welcome in our home, I kept a terrycloth robe for her to lounge in after a shower, along with a clean T-shirt and a pair of her own jeans for her to change into.” And: “Marilyn couldn't afford emotions when she had to sleep with wrinkled old men to survive the business.” “There were times when she would come home exhausted from a day's shoot and some powerful old geezer would telephone and her skin would crawl. After the horrors of her studio sex she would come over and stay in our shower for an hour or more. She wanted to wash away the terrible indignities she'd had to endure. Then she'd sit down to dinner and ask for second helpings." Excerpts from : Marilyn, Joe and Me, by June DiMaggio, as told to Mary Jane Popp, copyright December 2005, Authentic Creations Inc., Atlanta, Georgia. Special thanks to Robert W. Otto, president and CEO of Marilyn Monroe Exhibits LLC, for his assistance. (Naturally, those jeans are displayed on the Queen Mary, as June must have known that they would be worth something, five decades later.)
(Photo: The inside of one of the numerous display cases of the "$10 million exhibit. No comment.)
(Photo: The so called "Doll-Salon")
(Photo: the books and wine bottles of Robert W. Otto, but NOT of Marilyn Monroe!)
Hefner lent his presence to the opening night of the Marilyn exhibit, and devoted the cover of the December Playboy and three feature stories on her, and it would be hard to say which one is most disgusting. Story #1 is a rehash of Marilyn the Murder Mystery, that begins with a reference to Marilyn’s attic being stuffed with sophisticated listening devices . . . this in a dollhouse of a Spanish hacienda that had no closets, much less an attic! Story #2 is the ramblings and fantasies of June DiMaggio, which were discussed earlier. Story #3 is the recollections of 88-year-old John Miner, former L.A. deputy district attorney, who says he listened to tape recordings Marilyn made for her psychiatrist. Miner claims that the tapes prove Marilyn was in a non-suicidal mood and so, obviously, she must have been murdered. But the woman Miner transcribes is a silly, frivolous, bobble-head blonde—Lorelei Lee maybe, not Marilyn Monroe. Miner calls for a champion to demand a new autopsy, to prove murder, and apparently Hugh Hefner is going to take up the banner. God help us, and Marilyn. Heffner long ago bought the crypt next to Marilyn’s in Westwood Memorial Cemetery. He is also, by the way, another client of Mark Roesler.
(Photo: One of the biggest forgery of the last Centry made it to the cover of Time magazine! And history is repeating itself again!) Milli Vanilli was a 80s pop vocal duo, very popular, until a record jammed, revealing that, hey, that really wasn’t them singing. It broke their hearts but they had to return their Grammy award. One of the two "stars", Rob Pilatus commited later on (accidential) suicide. He was only 33 years old. Three years younger than Marilyn Monroe when she died.
(Photo: The world famous pop duo "Milli Vanilli" with their Grammy awards, which they were later stripped of! From homeless, to superstars, and because of the mega scandal, it ended tragic!)
We also know that saying something is so doesn’t make it so. Robert Otto states that his exhibit is to tour for 10 to 12 years, visiting 39 cities on six continents. It must have been a success so far, as billboards are going up around Los Angeles. It was scheduled to close this month, but now it has been extended until June 8th, 2006—no doubt an attempt to capitalize on Marilyn Monroe's 80th birthday celebration (on June 1st, 2006) to draw more victims into the show.
I thought of handcuffing myself to the historic ocean liner and holding up a protest banner. What if I went on a hunger strike, or even threatened to jump off the ship? I think I was seriously close to doing it! The Queen Mary corporation was contacted, and numerous messages left on their answering machine, and numerous messages were ignored. It is now well known that the corporation has declared bankruptcy—you can find out on Google in a heartbeat. But I did not give up. Knowledge and belief kept me going. If we have learned anything from the recent Frey/Oprah affair, then it’s clear that this hoax, this scandal surrounding Marilyn Monroe, needs to be exposed immediately. The exhibit needs to be shut down. Ticket purchasers should ask for their money back (for almost three months of unfair business—isn’t there’s a California law against that?) and the thriving powers behind this need to be exposed in public and in the media. And they should apologize -- just as Oprah Winfrey did -- for this unbelievable scam.
(Photo: "a photo, that says it all!" The Marilyn Monroe ice sculpture from press opening for the fraudulent exhibit quickly turned into a very unhappy and scary sight)
THINKING BACK . . . I never really understood why I was willing to spend my life savings, plus the inheritance my father left me, on Marilyn Monroe memorabilia. Or why I gave up my flourishing acting career to devote myself to collecting and preserving her memorabilia. Now, after all these years, I seem to have found my answers. I am stunned by the whole DiMaggio/Roesler/Otto organization. They are all obviously just in it for the money. It was poorly planned from the beginning, but it seems that they are getting away with it. When the estate of Marilyn Monroe sold her personal belongings and most intimate items for $13,404,785—they gave away their chance for a 100% authentic exhibit that would have become legendary. “Marilyn Monroe: the Exhibit” needs to be exposed and stopped, because it is a scandal and a crime. Anyone who stops to seriously think about it will see the hurtful dimension this could have, not only for Hollywood, but for the United States of America . . . once they start bringing these shabby, phony items to other countries and start charging outrageous entrance fees. Otto speaks of eventually installing his Marilyn exhibit in a museum, which would only perpetuate this deception, the Marilyn fantasies, and the hoax. I consider it a privilege to defend Marilyn Monroe against the people mentioned above; it is my whole purpose for being who I am and what I know about Marilyn Monroe. I am not afraid of any lawsuit from the powerful CMG, as I have something valuable that they don’t have—PROOF! Proof in the form of witness statements, photos, documents, biographical statements, and my own in-depth knowledge, plus the knowledge and encouragement from Marilyn Monroe fans and admirers from all over the world! I thank you all for supporting this very urgent matter. Mark Bellinghaus February 6, 2006
Mark Bellinghaus owns one of the most extensive, important and comprehensive Marilyn Monroe collections. It includes movie costumes, personal clothing, jewelry, cosmetics, books, documents, autographs, cancelled checks and other personal items. He has most of the Mexican furniture from her Brentwood home, including five paintings, mirrors, a table lamp, the famous Chac mool wall hanging, 26 of her personal books, her trademark white fox stole, massage table, travel bag, Mexican pottery and glass pieces, utensils, pots and kitchen items. He recently bought (real) original hair rollers with strands of blonde hair attached, at an auction which originated from the estate of Marilyn Monroe. Every item is fully documented, most with photos showing Marilyn wearing them. Mark Bellinghaus is widely regarded as a Marilyn Monroe expert, and has been called upon by Christie’s, Sotheby’s, and other major auction houses to authenticate Marilyn items being offered. He has also been a successful actor, writer, and photographer, and has appeared in such movies as “The Name of the Rose” and many other film, TV and stage productions in his native Germany.
(Photo: Marilyn Monroe - this time is the image correct (her beautymark on the right side, and not like the exhibit, on the Admission ticket), without her famous trademark, her white fox furstole, which she wore for uncountable photo options, premiers (with Joe DiMaggio and Arthur Miller) and even in one of her signature movies: "How To Marry A Millionaire"! It remained with her, for her entire and so short life. It was stored since her death in 1962. I am happy, beyond words, as it is a "highlight", of my collection!) |
